2019-2020年高考英語總復(fù)習(xí)真題研練29牛津譯林版.doc

《2019-2020年高考英語總復(fù)習(xí)真題研練29牛津譯林版.doc》由會(huì)員分享，可在線閱讀，更多相關(guān)《2019-2020年高考英語總復(fù)習(xí)真題研練29牛津譯林版.doc（3頁珍藏版）》請?jiān)谘b配圖網(wǎng)上搜索。

2019-2020年高考英語總復(fù)習(xí)真題研練29牛津譯林版 Task 1：閱讀下列短文，從每題所給的四個(gè)選項(xiàng)(A、B、C和D)中，選出最佳選項(xiàng)。 (xx·全國Ⅲ，D)Bad news sells.If it bleeds，it leads.No news is good news，and good news is no news.Those are the classic rules for the evening broadcasts and the morning papers.But now that information is being spread and monitored(監(jiān)控) in different ways，researchers are discovering new rules.By tracking people's e-mails and online posts，scientists have found that good news can spread faster and farther than disasters and sob stories. “The ‘if it bleeds’ rule works for mass media，” says Jonah Berger，a scholar at the University of Pennsylvania.“They want your eyeballs and don't care how you're feeling.But when you share a story with your friends，you care a lot more how they react.You don't want them to think of you as a Debbie Downer.” Researchers analyzing word-of-mouth munication—e-mails，Web posts and reviews，face-to-face conversations—found that it tended to be more positive than negative(消極的)，but that didn't necessarily mean people preferred positive news.Was positive news shared more often simply because people experienced more good things than bad things? To test for that possibility，Dr.Berger looked at how people spread a particular set of news stories：thousands of articles on The New York Times' website.He and a Penn colleague analyzed the “most e-mailed” list for six months.One of his first findings was that articles in the science section were much more likely to make the list than non-science articles.He found that science amazed Times' readers and made them want to share this positive feeling with others. Readers also tended to share articles that were exciting or funny，or that inspired negative feelings like anger or anxiety，but not articles that left them merely sad.They needed to be aroused(激發(fā)) one way or the other，and they preferred good news to bad.The more positive an article，the more likely it was to be shared，as Dr.Berger explains in his new book，“Contagious：Why Things Catch On.” 【語篇解讀】　本文是一篇議論文，研究表明好消息要比壞消息在網(wǎng)絡(luò)上傳播的更快、更廣。 1．What do the classic rules mentioned in the text apply to? A．News reports. B．Research papers. C．Private e-mails. D．Daily conversations. 答案　A　[細(xì)節(jié)理解題。根據(jù)首段中的Those are the classic rules for the evening broadcasts and the morning papers.可知，這些規(guī)則適用于新聞報(bào)道。故選A。] 2．What can we infer about people like Debbie Downer? A．They're socially inactive. B．They're good at telling stories. C．They're inconsiderate of others. D．They're careful with their words. 答案　C　[細(xì)節(jié)理解題。根據(jù)第二段最后兩句可知，像Debbie Downer那樣的人是不替別人著想的。故選C。] 3．Which tended to be the most e-mailed according to Dr.Berger's research? A．Sports news. B．Science articles. C．Personal accounts. D．Financial reviews. 答案　B　[細(xì)節(jié)理解題。根據(jù)第三段最后兩句可知，人們更愿意發(fā)送一些科學(xué)類的文章。故選B。] 4．What can be a suitable title for the text? A．Sad Stories Travel Far and Wide B．Online News Attracts More People C．Reading Habits Change with the Times D．Good News Beats Bad on Social Networks 答案　D　[文章標(biāo)題題。文章主要表明了通過研究證明了好消息要比壞消息在網(wǎng)絡(luò)上傳播的更快、更廣。故選D。] Task 2：詞匯積累 1．track n．軌道；蹤跡 v．追蹤；跟蹤 2．positive adj.積極的；肯定的 3．negative adj.否定的；消極的；負(fù)面的 4．review n．復(fù)習(xí)；回顧；檢討；評審 5．monitor v．監(jiān)視；監(jiān)督；監(jiān)聽n.班長；監(jiān)視器；〔計(jì)算機(jī)〕顯示器 6．online post網(wǎng)上的帖子 7．mass media 大眾媒體 Task 3：語法填空 One of his first finds was __1__ articles in the science section were much more likely to make the list than non-science articles.He found that science amazed Times' readers and made them want to share this positive feeling __2__ others. Readers also tended __3__ (share)articles that were exciting or funny，or that inspired negative feelings like anger or __4__ (anxious)，but not articles that left them merely sad.They needed to be aroused(激發(fā)) one way or the other，and they preferred good news __5__ bad.The more positive an article，the more likely it was to be shared，__6__ Dr.Berger explains in his new book，“Contagious：Why Things Catch On.” 答案　1.that　2.with　3.to share　4.anxiety　5.to 6．a(chǎn)s Task 4：單句改錯(cuò) 1．They want your eyeballs and don't care what you're feeling. 2．You don't want them to think you as a Debbie Downer. 3．Were positive news shared more often simply because people experienced more good things than bad things? 答案　1.what→how　2.think后加as　3.Were→Was Task 5：攻克長難句(分析句子結(jié)構(gòu)，嘗試翻譯成漢語) Researchers analyzing word-of-mouth munication—e-mails，Web posts and reviews，face-to-face conversations—found that it tended to be more positive than negative(消極的)，but that didn't necessarily mean people preferred positive news. 分析：本句為連詞but連接的兩個(gè)并列分句，第一個(gè)分句為含有一個(gè)賓語從句的復(fù)合句，主句的主語是Researchers，其后的現(xiàn)在分詞短語analyzing word-of-mouth munication作定語，謂語是 found，后面是that引導(dǎo)的賓語從句；第二個(gè)分句也是一個(gè)含有賓語從句的復(fù)合句。 譯文：分析口述交際如電子郵件、網(wǎng)帖、評論和面談的研究者發(fā)現(xiàn)，它傾向于更積極而不是消極(的內(nèi)容)，但這并不一定意味著人們更偏愛積極的消息。